How many of you who are in the classroom or working in other positions in schools have been consulted about the future re-restructuring of our school system? How many of you have been asked about what you need to improve the academic achievement of your students? Who’s asking parents about their aspirations for the educational future of their children? I think Randi Weingarten’s letter that appeared (slightly edited) in the Daily News on Jan. 31, speaks for all of us who have been omitted from the process:
(Un-edited version sent to Daily News)
“It’s no surprise the Daily News and the Department of Education
have the same basic philosophy: Don’t ask – or listen to – teachers.
“If anyone bothered to listen to teachers, they would say they
need smaller classes, increased resources, more respect and greater
professional latitude. If anyone bothered to listen, teachers also would
cite research showing that smaller classes yield higher student achievement – from pre-K through high school.
“And it’s not just teachers. If anyone bothered to listen to
parents, they would name class size their top issue. In Math A for example,
classes in New York City run about 32; in the rest of the state it’s around
21. Ask any parent which class they’d want for their child. Ask any parent
who opts for a charter school their top reason for doing so: They will tell
you it’s smaller classes.
“But don’t ask me – I’m just a teacher.”
Randi Weingarten,
President, United Federation of Teachers–
1 Comment:
1 phyllis c. murray
· Jan 31, 2007 at 11:28 pm
Notes From A Teacher’s Journal
“Our schools have been turned into all-purpose institutions, and any institution that doesn’t have a single purpose will be saddled with all sorts of things that other institutions should be doing — and it won’t do any of them well. We must restore the central academic mission of our public schools.” Albert Shanker 1993 QuEST Conference
The No Child Left Behind Legislation of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), has been a wake up call for many. This United States federal law is the key to a reauthorization of a number of federal programs that aim to improve the performance of America’s primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for states, school districts and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. Thus, throughout New York City, parents are now given opportunities to decide where to send Johnny. Many parents are turning their backs on the public school system because they feel the city, state and federal governments have also turned their backs on inner-city public schools.
These parents are looking for vouchers, scholarships, charter schools, private and religious institutions to meet their needs. Far too often this pattern is repeated nationwide. We can even say that the public schools throughout the nation have been pauperized as one hears the cries of overcrowded classrooms, crumbling school buildings, out-of-date libraries, lack of textbooks, low academic standards, student violence, inadequate school safety, and failure to have highly qualified teachers i.e. one who has fulfilled the state’s certification and licensure requirements in every classroom.
When education is not a priority, the funding educators seek to implement the NCLB Law is never adequate. What we see is the fact that European and Asian nations are outdistancing the U.S. in the competitive world job market. These nations have reached the goal of educational excellence in their schools. These nations are investing in their greatest resource: their children.
Martin Luther King was able to forecast this phenomenon in a speech he made to the UFT in 1964. “Education for all Americans has always been inadequate,” King said. “The richest nation on earth has never allocated enough of its abundant resources to build sufficient schools to compensate adequately its teachers. We squander funds on highways and the frenetic pursuit of recreation, on the overabundance of overkill armaments but we pauperize education.”
It was Dr. King who reminded us that” we are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.” Collaboration is the key in all successful negotiations. But that collaboration must embody mutual trust and mutual respect.
Dr. King spoke, but apparently those in positions of leadership and power in government were not listening. King was assassinated in 1968. His legacy lives on today in those who wish to join teachers and concerned parents in a quest to provide the best education possible for all Americans. Yes, teachers and parents must continue to be the best advocates for children and education in America. Their voices must be heard.
Phyllis C. Murray
District 8 Region 2