Comments on: Class Sizes Rise Again http://www.edwize.org/class-sizes-rise-again Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:46:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Ziggy http://www.edwize.org/class-sizes-rise-again/comment-page-1#comment-66711 Ziggy Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:46:54 +0000 http://www.edwize.org/?p=5598#comment-66711 Class size has a lot to do with kids in the United States not getting a good education. How can kids get a good education when there's 30 kids in the same class. Getting questions answered in class for all the students would take away from the lesson plan. Smaller class sizes equals better learning. Class size has a lot to do with kids in the United States not getting a good education. How can kids get a good education when there’s 30 kids in the same class. Getting questions answered in class for all the students would take away from the lesson plan. Smaller class sizes equals better learning.

]]> By: Larry Littlefield http://www.edwize.org/class-sizes-rise-again/comment-page-1#comment-66708 Larry Littlefield Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:35:20 +0000 http://www.edwize.org/?p=5598#comment-66708 Why are you complaining about higher class sizes? Class sizes are increasing to pay for teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62. Future teachers just had their take home pay cut by 5.0% to pay for past teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62. Everyone will pay higher taxes to pay for teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62, other than retired public employes whose income is exempt from state and local income taxes. And the schools are going to gutted over the next two years to pay for teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62, over and above the damage done by falling tax revenues (due to city residents falling incomes) in the recession. That's what you wanted, isn't it? Why are you complaining about higher class sizes? Class sizes are increasing to pay for teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62. Future teachers just had their take home pay cut by 5.0% to pay for past teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62. Everyone will pay higher taxes to pay for teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62, other than retired public employes whose income is exempt from state and local income taxes. And the schools are going to gutted over the next two years to pay for teachers who retired at 55 instead of 62, over and above the damage done by falling tax revenues (due to city residents falling incomes) in the recession.

That’s what you wanted, isn’t it?

]]>