Log in  |  Search

Class Warfare

Class Warfare: that’s the title Steven Brill gave to his recent book on the state of American education.

With such a title, one might think that that Brill’s book would investigate how the deep class divisions between America’s wealthy class and our poor and working class, a gap that has grown immensely over the last four decades, has harmed our schools and our students. After all, educational research has shown that greatest challenge our schools face is the grinding effect of poverty on so many of the students we teach.

But Brill’s book embraces without question or qualification the diagnosis of the wealthy Wall Street hedge-fund managers who have driven much of the dominant ‘education reform’ agenda: in their view, the educational failures of schools and students are the fault of public school teachers and teacher unions. This Wall Street scapegoating of teachers and unions is a profoundly self-serving narrative: for if it is poverty that, above all other factors, has the greatest negative impact on educational achievement, then educational progress would require us to address why, in the words of New York Times reporter Michael Winerip, “people like [the Wall Street hedge fund managers] are allowed to make so much when others have so little.” Winerip posed this question to Brill, who replied that he had not seen the ‘class warfare’ in American education “as the rich versus the union guys, although now that you say it, I can see how you could draw that line.”

Brill demonstrates a special talent for ignoring the obvious in his book, but perhaps nowhere is his obliviousness more glaring than on the nature of the ‘class warfare’ that now afflicts American education.

Forbes Magazine’s
Ten Wealthiest Americans

  1. Bill Gates
  2. Warren Buffet
  3. Larry Ellison
  4. Christy Walton & Family
  5. Charles Koch
  6. David Koch
  7. Jim Walton
  8. Alice Walton
  9. Robson Walton
  10. Michael Bloomberg

Every year, Forbes Magazine publishes a list of the wealthiest Americans, and nine of the top ten richest men and women on the Forbes’ list figure prominently in open ‘class warfare’ against teachers and unions. Just look at what these powerful billionaires have done over the last year.

The wealthiest American is Bill Gates, who in recent months has attacked teacher tenure, teacher pay schedules, seniority layoffs and smaller class sizes. The Gates Foundation is now actively pursuing those regressive goals: it provided significant resources to promoting the anti-teacher, anti-union propaganda movie “Waiting for Superman.” (Gates himself appeared in “Waiting for Superman” as an ‘educational expert.’) Since the second wealthiest American, Warren Buffet, does his philanthropy through the Gates Foundation, he is effectively aligned with Gates’ educational agenda.

Four of the ten wealthiest Americans are from the Walton family, the owners of Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart is the leading violator of child labor laws in the United States and the most obstinately anti-union of American corporations. The Walton Family foundation has involved itself in education, with the goal of eviscerating the American union movement by undermining one of its strongest pillars — teacher unions. Walton has supported campaigns to institute vouchers, promoted “Waiting for Superman” and provided financial support to anti-union forces within the charter school movement and to anti-teacher organizations such as Michelle Rhee’s Orwellian named “Students First” and New York’s “Education Reform Now.”

Two of the ten wealthiest Americans are the Koch brothers, Charles and David Koch, who came to public attention first as the main financiers of the far right Tea Party movement and then as the bankrollers of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and his efforts to destroy his state’s public sector unions — especially its teacher unions. Koch Industries is one of the leading corporate polluters in the US, and the Kochs fund organizations that claim “global warming” is a hoax.

Forbes’ tenth wealthiest American is New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has campaigned over the last year for an end to seniority layoffs and the transformation of teaching into de facto at will employment, in which teachers can be fired for any reason, an end to teacher tenure and a radical diminishment of teacher pensions and health care.

Only one of Forbes’ ten wealthiest Americans is not engaged in active political warfare against public school teachers and teacher unions.

Teachers and teacher unions have not sought out this class warfare. To the contrary, the American Federation of Teachers made an effort to establish a dialogue with Bill Gates, inviting Gates to address our last national convention in Seattle. This overture had its critics, but it would be a serious mistake for unions to talk only to those who agreed with us. By the same token, we need to be honest about the results of our efforts at dialogue: Gates has become outspoken in his anti-teacher pronouncements. There’s not much left to discuss when he assumes such a posture.

In an unguarded moment, Warren Buffet bluntly communicated the reality that we now face. “There’s class warfare, all right,” Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”

The realization that the class of the wealthy and powerful is waging war against teachers and teacher unions is a daunting one. We know that we will never be able to come close to matching their resources, dollar for dollar. But we are far from defenseless. In the words of the old union anthem “Solidarity Forever,” we possess “a power greater than their hoarded gold” in a resource they can never own — the ranks of teachers, unionists, families of public school students, working people and advocates of a rich and robust public square in American life.

What we face now has been faced by generations before us — in the labor movement, the civil rights and abolitionist movements, the feminist movement, and the movement to establish public education. Those who came before us overcame the powerful forces allied against them because they had moral right on their side, and appealed to what is best in America. They made the road, the freedom road that we now march down in their footsteps. This class warfare of the wealthy and powerful, like the class warfare that has come before, will not stand.

UPDATE:
The spelling of Mr. Brill’s first name has been changed from Stephen to Steven.

Print

13 Comments:

  • 1 Steven Brill
    · Sep 14, 2011 at 5:04 pm

    When diatribes like this distort my book and distort the facts, I can usually take solace in the old PR cliche that “at least you spelled my name right.”

    But here in addition to everything else you even got that wrong.

    Steven Brill

  • 2 Leo Casey
    · Sep 14, 2011 at 6:14 pm

    Mr. Bill:

    “A diatribe” that “distorts” your book and “distorts” the facts, and the all you can offer by way of a bill of particulars is that your first name was spelled Stephen rather than Steven?

  • 3 Remainders: Teaching the non-academic ingredients of success | GothamSchools
    · Sep 14, 2011 at 6:43 pm

    […] UFT vice president Leo Casey points out that”Class Warfare” doesn’t grapple much with class. (Edwize) […]

  • 4 Online Education in America » Blog Archive » Remainders: Teaching the non-academic ingredients of success
    · Sep 14, 2011 at 6:53 pm

    […] UFT vice president Leo Casey points out that”Class Warfare” doesn’t grapple much with class. (Edwize) […]

  • 5 Leo finally comes around. « Fred Klonsky's blog
    · Sep 14, 2011 at 7:31 pm

    […] Leo Casey from EdWize: […]

  • 6 andy s
    · Sep 14, 2011 at 9:40 pm

    Great article – and you were also great on the panel a couple weeks ago. Keep up the important work! The historical context and roll call of movements make a big difference.

  • 7 Julie R
    · Sep 15, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    Yet again, something in the media to bash teachers: the very people who are employed to edify, enrich, and help your children develop into responsible and caring members of society. It’s no wonder so many people do not stay in the profession. After twelve years of being an educator, I think all of this is getting too much for me. I may quit soon.

  • 8 Kathleen
    · Sep 15, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    Go, Leo!

  • 9 Arthur Goldstein
    · Sep 15, 2011 at 7:26 pm

    It’s telling that Mr. Brill comes here complaining of distortions of facts, yet offers not one example. In fact, many “reforms” are unsupported by facts yet widely accepted by both the media and the public. Thus, Mr. Brill confidently comes here and makes broad statements with no support whatsoever, expecting the same treatment he’d receive on, say, the Oprah Winfrey show or the so-called Education Nation.

    In 1984 I was in East Berlin, where Pravda was sold on every corner. Unlike the US circa 2011, no one actually bought it.

  • 10 Linda Johnson
    · Sep 16, 2011 at 12:09 am

    I just finished reading Mr. Brill’s book, which I enjoyed, but I was stunned when I realized he did not mean “class warfare” in the sense of one class of people against the other. If anything was clearly demonstrated in his book, it was the fact that all his heroes are rich guys who are waging war against (mostly) working class teachers. The reform movement is a movement of the rich against the working class for control of the schools. (I read recently that one of our billionaires admitted this and bragged, “And my side is winning!”) Also, I don’t think Brill noticed that all his heroes share one thing in common: they are not teachers. In fact it is understood in the book that all those bright Yale and Harvard people would not themselves teach. Well, there you have it, one of the biggest problems in American education: Teaching children under 18 is considered “women’s work” and not suitable for the middle and upper classes. Not many things hurt our children more than this pernicious attitude, so aptly (although unknowingly) described by Mr. Brill.

    The status quo in education is schooling by zip code: separate and unequal schools for rich and poor. Teachers and other child advocates have been fighting for equity in education for years. Just providing infant, toddler and preschool would be a huge step forward. I hope talented journalists like Mr. Brill join teachers in destroying the real status quo in education. We can do it!

  • 11 Bill Cleary
    · Sep 21, 2011 at 1:30 am

    It’s apparent to many Americans who have been subjected to poor schools and overall “lowered expectations” that there’s a need for radical change. The public schools in America, once the envy of the world, are barely functioning and failing miserably. We need to provide serious alternatives to improve the plight of our kids.

  • 12 Kathi Berke
    · Sep 21, 2011 at 4:15 am

    To demonize public school teachers is the worst kind of class warfare. “School Reform” advocates (and as the writer says, none of them are teachers) must have another agenda. If billionaires are supplying wads of money to advocate for their position, they will succeed in siphoning off public money for private gain and decimate a powerful force for educating all children. Good bye, Mr. Chips. The Subprime of Miss Jean Brodie. Smartboard Jungle. As usual, the rich are turning a right (to a compulsory public education) into a privilege (the best education money can buy). Diane Ravitch is a living, breathing treasure.

  • 13 The One Percent and US « Talking Union
    · Oct 24, 2011 at 9:00 am

    […] attack from the One Percent. Of the top ten wealthiest Americans identified by Forbes Magazine, nine, including Michael Bloomberg, have been involved in political campaigns against public school […]