<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Closing Schools: D is for Demographics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwize.org/closing-schools-d-is-for-demographics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwize.org/closing-schools-d-is-for-demographics</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd2718</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/closing-schools-d-is-for-demographics/comment-page-1#comment-66890</link>
		<dc:creator>jd2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwize.org/?p=6073#comment-66890</guid>
		<description>Jackie,

you write that the formula is deeply flawed.

I do not agree. I think the very existence of the Progress Reports is the problem. They were designed to discipline and punish schools, teachers, and students.

You also write that &quot;DoE didn’t intend this problem&quot; - but neither of us can know intent.  But there is a track record. This DoE, Klein and Bloomberg, they have acted against the interests of students, teachers, and schools again and again.

At best we can claim ignorance - we don&#039;t know their intent. We could make a strong case that intent was present based on their other actions. 

It stretches credulity to claim that they didn&#039;t intend the problems they have created. There is no basis for making such a statement. 

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackie,</p>
<p>you write that the formula is deeply flawed.</p>
<p>I do not agree. I think the very existence of the Progress Reports is the problem. They were designed to discipline and punish schools, teachers, and students.</p>
<p>You also write that &#8220;DoE didn’t intend this problem&#8221; &#8211; but neither of us can know intent.  But there is a track record. This DoE, Klein and Bloomberg, they have acted against the interests of students, teachers, and schools again and again.</p>
<p>At best we can claim ignorance &#8211; we don&#8217;t know their intent. We could make a strong case that intent was present based on their other actions. </p>
<p>It stretches credulity to claim that they didn&#8217;t intend the problems they have created. There is no basis for making such a statement. </p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Chairman Chang: Don&#8217;t Close Schools, Bad Science Does Not Make Good Schools. &#171; Ed In The Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/closing-schools-d-is-for-demographics/comment-page-1#comment-66790</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Chairman Chang: Don&#8217;t Close Schools, Bad Science Does Not Make Good Schools. &#171; Ed In The Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwize.org/?p=6073#comment-66790</guid>
		<description>[...] children without these disabilities, not surprisingly the output was higher graduation rates.   The data from the large high schools reflects the larger numbers of Special Education youngsters and in lower graduation rates in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] children without these disabilities, not surprisingly the output was higher graduation rates.   The data from the large high schools reflects the larger numbers of Special Education youngsters and in lower graduation rates in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Mc Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/closing-schools-d-is-for-demographics/comment-page-1#comment-66789</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Mc Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edwize.org/?p=6073#comment-66789</guid>
		<description>Please let me correct one misunderstanding that so many people have about special education.....there is no MRE in the law.  The law explicitly states that the LRE is the place where the child,with appropriate supports and services, will learn.   The LRE, Least Restrictive Environment,  is the right place the first time, it is not a guess, not a game, not a try this til we find the right place.  It is not a sliding scale of less to more.  Please don&#039;t fall into the trap set by the DOE to confuse and confound parents and advocates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please let me correct one misunderstanding that so many people have about special education&#8230;..there is no MRE in the law.  The law explicitly states that the LRE is the place where the child,with appropriate supports and services, will learn.   The LRE, Least Restrictive Environment,  is the right place the first time, it is not a guess, not a game, not a try this til we find the right place.  It is not a sliding scale of less to more.  Please don&#8217;t fall into the trap set by the DOE to confuse and confound parents and advocates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

