<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debating &#8220;Value Added&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwize.org/debating-value-added/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwize.org/debating-value-added</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Quick and the Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/debating-value-added/comment-page-1#comment-65014</link>
		<dc:creator>The Quick and the Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/debating-value-added#comment-65014</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Objections  Over at the UFT, Leo Casey accuses us of various rhetorical sins involves caricatures, straw men, etc, in recent comments about the NYC [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Objections  Over at the UFT, Leo Casey accuses us of various rhetorical sins involves caricatures, straw men, etc, in recent comments about the NYC [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peeing into the Wind: Why is Klein Picking Losing Fights With the Teachers Union? &#171; Ed In The Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/debating-value-added/comment-page-1#comment-64990</link>
		<dc:creator>Peeing into the Wind: Why is Klein Picking Losing Fights With the Teachers Union? &#171; Ed In The Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/debating-value-added#comment-64990</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] The folks over at Edwize, Leo Casey and City Sue, skewered the concept, and, the blogosphere in general was skeptical. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] The folks over at Edwize, Leo Casey and City Sue, skewered the concept, and, the blogosphere in general was skeptical. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use test scores to rate teachers? I object! &#171; JD2718</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/debating-value-added/comment-page-1#comment-64969</link>
		<dc:creator>Use test scores to rate teachers? I object! &#171; JD2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/debating-value-added#comment-64969</guid>
		<description>[...]  So some nasty &#8216;centrist democrats&#8216; (apologies for the links, seemed necessary) go after Leo and the UFT for being opposed to rating teachers based on test scores on principle. And Leo clearly shows that they have ignored his carefully constructed methodological arguments against. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  So some nasty &#8216;centrist democrats&#8216; (apologies for the links, seemed necessary) go after Leo and the UFT for being opposed to rating teachers based on test scores on principle. And Leo clearly shows that they have ignored his carefully constructed methodological arguments against. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

