It’s Monday, Oct. 17, the day new regulations in the federal bankruptcy code make it tougher to file Chapter 11 protection from meeting creditor obligations. In corporate parlance, “creditors” include union workers’ contracts and pension-fund obligations. Guess which creditors will get the squeeze from the now bottomed-out Delphi Corp?
Filing papers under the wire, Delphi Corp., the nation’s largest auto-parts company, and ranked 63rd on the Fortune 500 list, asked for bankruptcy protection Oct. 9. It blamed high labor costs from its unionized workers in the U.S. for its incapacity to compete with more cost-conscious (read low-paying) foreign rivals. The solution it sought, a new deal with the United Auto Workers containing mammoth labor concessions, was rejected by the union. The Troy, Mich.-based parts giant now wants the deal resurrected, and this time imposed by the court.
How huge are the demanded givebacks? The oracles at Delphi want to end health and life insurance for its roughly 12,000 American retirees while cutting the wages of its 35,000 hourly U.S.-based workers by some 67 percent. That means driving wages down to $10 an hour. Now THAT’S a deal worth complaining about.
To get some perspective on just how bad is the proffered deal, consider that mass-production-auto pioneer Henry Ford paid his production workers $5 a day in 1914, . It was considered good money at the time. Adjusting that $5 a day for inflation, a wage of $10 per hour today would be just $4.76 per day in 1914. So much for a century of progress.
As economist Paul Krugman noted this morning, "If Delphi slashes wages and defaults on its pension obligations, the rest of the auto industry may well be tempted – or forced – to do the same. And that will mark the end of the era in which ordinary working Americans could be part of the middle class.”
Restraints on keeping ordinary Americans from falling into poverty is not one of the “parts” Delphi manufactures or prizes. Robert S. Miller, its new chairman and chief executive officer, said, "We took this action because we are determined to achieve competitiveness for Delphi’s core United States operations. We simply cannot afford to continue to be encumbered by high legacy issues and burdensome restrictions under current labor agreements that impair our ability to compete,"
Note the Aesopian language: Paying workers a fair wage is, in the vocabulary of corporate newspeak, a “high legacy issue”, and a mutually agreed-to union contract becomes a “burdensome restriction.”
According to The Washington Post, Delphi listed $17.1 billion in assets and $22.2 billion in debt in its bankruptcy filing. Delphi also had $4.3 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, some of which may have to be picked up by the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.—read the taxpayers.
Delphi employs 185,000 workers worldwide, and just 32,000 workers in the US, of whom a mere 24,000 are UAW members. While looking to eviscerate workers’ wages, it continued paying dividends until last month. In China, it pays its workers the equivalent of $3 per hour, though it also throws in lunch and bus transportation to and from work.
Delphi even uses Bizzaro-world math to exaggerate its total current U.S. compensation package per worker, placing it in the ruinous $125,000 to $130,000 per year range. Contradicting the figure, Dean Baker of the Center for Policy and Economic Research notes that
“this measure includes all labor costs incurred by Delphi, including costs for providing wages and benefits to laid off workers and retirees, averaged over the number of active employees at Delphi. While workers at Delphi receive substantially more pay and better benefits than most workers in the United States, only about half the sum mentioned in this article actually refers to wages or benefits seen by current workers.”
While the new-broom Miller hopes to sweep out union standards, he has already, “sweetened severance packages available to its top 21 executives, a move the company said was necessary to retain its newly assembled management team,” reported The New York Times.
UAW President Ron Gettlefinger said, "Once again, we see the disgusting spectacle of the people at the top taking care of themselves at the same time they are demanding extraordinary sacrifices from their hourly workers, engineers, administrative and support staff, midlevel managers and others."
In fairness, Delphi Corp. announced today that Miller, brought in just three months ago to turn the company around, “will reduce his salary to $1 per year, effective Jan. 1, 2006, and continuing until Delphi successfully emerges from its reorganization in Chapter 11. In addition, the Delphi officers who were at Delphi at the time when Miller joined the company, volunteered to waive 10 percent of their base pay, 20 percent in the case of President Rodney O’Neal, to be effective Jan. 1, 2006. That’s magnanimous, considering Miller’s predecessor, J T. Battenberg, earned $6,287,384 in total compensation in 2004, including stock option grants., according to the AFL-CIO’s Paywatch.
Offering a proactive solution to the auto industry’s fiscal woes, Gettelfinger repeatedly calls for a national health care system as a way to lessen the financial burden on Detroit automakers. That’s something automakers have not joined in supporting.
Delphi likes to talk about the “cocoon of safety” its parts products provide drivers. What got birthed from this bankruptcy chrysalis is no butterfly. More like a vampire bat.




8 Comments:
1 paulrubin
· Oct 17, 2005 at 9:06 pm
Should be interesting to see the Republicans explain to the hundreds of thousands of auto workers (and those related to the auto industry) why they should vote for them in the upcoming elections. General rule of thumb is people vote their pocket books and if they’re futures are imperiled, the incumbents will feel their wrath.
2 cornell
· Oct 18, 2005 at 1:45 am
I think recent history belies “people vote their pocket books.” People voted twice for the worst president since Harding. Ugh! that wasn’t about their pocket books was it?
3 devils_advocate
· Oct 18, 2005 at 3:55 pm
No it wasn’t about their pockets. It was about their gullibility in following the word of people with an agenda… much like ICE.
4 NYC Educator
· Oct 18, 2005 at 6:09 pm
Much like Unity, too.
5 devils_advocate
· Oct 20, 2005 at 6:30 am
NYC Educator, (and the lot of you):
Nice quips, short on reality. Utopia is a nice place to be. We should all be on some sort of hallucinogen so we can won’t have a grip on reality.
But some of us, actually read the news and understand that we are in a very bad place politically, not just in NYC, but throughout the nation. That climate trickles down. And if you don’t think so, you are deluding yourself.
And I don’t want to hear about your superior education, because frankly, you can have three PhD’s and still not be able to process data and situations accurately and adroitly.
The age of entitlement is not dead, but it is going quickly toward extinction.
Without a revolutionary change in our leadership (I’m talking about GW Bush on down), your expectations fall extremely far from reality.
The fact that you can’t take the world from a reality point of view leads me to believe that you are either truly uninformed, (the majority of America is grossly uninformed about politics and economics) or so biased, that your glasses are obscuring your ability to see the truth.
There is also a possibility that emotional maturity is the problem here. Only children sit up and complain incessantly, “I want, I want, why can’t I have.” The rest of us evaluate where we are and understand that compromise is often necessary in order to make progress.
Much of your rhetoric sounds personal. It isn’t about the contract proposal. I’m convinced of that. Why am I convinced of that. Hmmmm. Refusals to acknowledge rebuttals answered in threads only to bring up the same complaint in other threads. (Every thread starts to look identical. I’m surprised the blogmaster hasn’t deleted all the off-topic comments. I would. I would say “This complaint has already been addressed. Stay on topic.) You don’t want answers. You just want to complain. I can imagine the voices. You must all be male and female versions of Andy Rooney. I have yet to see any substantial complaints posting based on fact. Only mere speculation and a lot of “fear-mongering”. The GOP is very good at creating “fact” by repeating the same lie over and over.
It seems to me, your complaints are political, as anyone following these threads can clearly see. It isn’t about the proposed contract.
6 NYC Educator
· Oct 20, 2005 at 3:21 pm
argumentum ad hominem
7 shouldhavegonetomeds
· Oct 22, 2005 at 6:10 pm
Before we let the OSI remove people from payroll based on their version of probable cause can anyone post Ed Stancik’s death certificate with the REAL cause of death? When you see the real cause of death signed by a licensed physician, who can’t lie at that point not even for the Roy Cohens of the world, vs the spun reason we were given, decide again if you want that office with its propensity to prevaricate decide probable cause for you based on the testimony of an emotionally upset child and/or family.
8 Hoa_Buu
· Oct 24, 2005 at 10:38 pm
We really need to be part of enrolling service industry folks… without loyal numbers we will never have politician’s ears…
GO UFT!