<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Educational Innovation And Teacher Union Contracts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwize.org/educational-innovation-and-teacher-union-contracts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwize.org/educational-innovation-and-teacher-union-contracts</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/educational-innovation-and-teacher-union-contracts/comment-page-1#comment-65774</link>
		<dc:creator>JW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=1237#comment-65774</guid>
		<description>Where you say that &quot;little attention is paid to what we have negotiated into our contracts to allow and even encourage educational innovation&quot; . . .

Actually:   What union management has negotiated INTO the contract is an utterly anemic Article 24, as well as a 99% guarantee that teachers will always have to succumb to administrators who put letters in their files and give them U-observations for pedagogy they don&#039;t happen to ascribe to. And we all know what those kinds of things lead to at the end of the year.

I can&#039;t see anything in the contract that &quot;encourages&quot; innovation in the classroom when it goes against what the principal wants.  You all caved in on autonomy in the classroom a long, long, long, long time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where you say that &#8220;little attention is paid to what we have negotiated into our contracts to allow and even encourage educational innovation&#8221; . . .</p>
<p>Actually:   What union management has negotiated INTO the contract is an utterly anemic Article 24, as well as a 99% guarantee that teachers will always have to succumb to administrators who put letters in their files and give them U-observations for pedagogy they don&#8217;t happen to ascribe to. And we all know what those kinds of things lead to at the end of the year.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see anything in the contract that &#8220;encourages&#8221; innovation in the classroom when it goes against what the principal wants.  You all caved in on autonomy in the classroom a long, long, long, long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hug, Interrupted. at More About Education</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/educational-innovation-and-teacher-union-contracts/comment-page-1#comment-65773</link>
		<dc:creator>Hug, Interrupted. at More About Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=1237#comment-65773</guid>
		<description>[...] Casey simply does not want to be loved! We were just about to hug it out and then he goes and does this. It&#8217;s not the first time Leo has disagreed to agree with me. And again, in this case, we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Casey simply does not want to be loved! We were just about to hug it out and then he goes and does this. It&#8217;s not the first time Leo has disagreed to agree with me. And again, in this case, we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

