<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mid-Year Evaluation/Where Do I Go From Here?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd2718</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/comment-page-1#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator>jd2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=244#comment-4118</guid>
		<description>With seniority transfers, half of all vacancies went to transfers, to UFT members.  Under this plan there is no guarantee of any going to transfers.

Under SBO transfers, the committee had, theoretically, control of hiring.  This theoretical control allowed them to balance the principal&#039;s practical power, at least a bit.  In most SBO schools the committee really met and interviewed the candidates. 

Under the new contract the commmittee is both practically and theoretically powerless - it will be hard to get members to sit on these committees... I&#039;d guess that committees will meet and conduct interviews in about 20% of schools... max.

I hope that chapters track hiring practices.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With seniority transfers, half of all vacancies went to transfers, to UFT members.  Under this plan there is no guarantee of any going to transfers.</p>
<p>Under SBO transfers, the committee had, theoretically, control of hiring.  This theoretical control allowed them to balance the principal&#8217;s practical power, at least a bit.  In most SBO schools the committee really met and interviewed the candidates. </p>
<p>Under the new contract the commmittee is both practically and theoretically powerless &#8211; it will be hard to get members to sit on these committees&#8230; I&#8217;d guess that committees will meet and conduct interviews in about 20% of schools&#8230; max.</p>
<p>I hope that chapters track hiring practices.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYC Educator</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/comment-page-1#comment-4117</link>
		<dc:creator>NYC Educator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=244#comment-4117</guid>
		<description>The old contract required complete posting also.  Whether or not rules were followed is a different matter entirely.

Now that the principal is no longer required to accept incoming transfers, there is no reason for them to hide openings, legally or otherwise.

For UFT members, this represents a step backward, and no benefit whatsoever.  I was particularly troubled that the same folks who trumpeted the benefits of the UFT transfer plan were willing to stand and make the absurd argument that we are somehow better without it.

That speaks to their utter lack of integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old contract required complete posting also.  Whether or not rules were followed is a different matter entirely.</p>
<p>Now that the principal is no longer required to accept incoming transfers, there is no reason for them to hide openings, legally or otherwise.</p>
<p>For UFT members, this represents a step backward, and no benefit whatsoever.  I was particularly troubled that the same folks who trumpeted the benefits of the UFT transfer plan were willing to stand and make the absurd argument that we are somehow better without it.</p>
<p>That speaks to their utter lack of integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvplab</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/comment-page-1#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>mvplab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=244#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>transfers:

But the new contract requires that every opening has to be posted not just 50 percent of the positions as was the case before. It is true that now principals have the final word after a school committee interviews applicants, but I suspect that was almost always the case anyway. 

Now that I have the &quot;age,&quot; age discrimination could be a problem and school committes should keep careful records to see if the principal creates a pattern of abuse/discrimination.(Not only age, but race, sex, and ethnicity.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>transfers:</p>
<p>But the new contract requires that every opening has to be posted not just 50 percent of the positions as was the case before. It is true that now principals have the final word after a school committee interviews applicants, but I suspect that was almost always the case anyway. </p>
<p>Now that I have the &#8220;age,&#8221; age discrimination could be a problem and school committes should keep careful records to see if the principal creates a pattern of abuse/discrimination.(Not only age, but race, sex, and ethnicity.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd2718</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/comment-page-1#comment-4102</link>
		<dc:creator>jd2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=244#comment-4102</guid>
		<description>“there is no more SBO transfer…”

Gee whiz. Why not? 

Because the new contract did away with them.  Strange.  I understand why the Board wanted to get rid of seniority transfers, but I thought they liked the SBO.  Anyhow, with the new system what was taking place in most places (principal chose) is now official.  I cannot see why a committee would even bother to meet under the new system.

We should watch out for principals who reject all transfer applicants and then hire the kid of a friend of a friend from outside the system.  We should also watch out for systematic age discrimination.  It&#039;s only school-based personnel who will be able to see the pattern.  I hope chapters are alert for this.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“there is no more SBO transfer…”</p>
<p>Gee whiz. Why not? </p>
<p>Because the new contract did away with them.  Strange.  I understand why the Board wanted to get rid of seniority transfers, but I thought they liked the SBO.  Anyhow, with the new system what was taking place in most places (principal chose) is now official.  I cannot see why a committee would even bother to meet under the new system.</p>
<p>We should watch out for principals who reject all transfer applicants and then hire the kid of a friend of a friend from outside the system.  We should also watch out for systematic age discrimination.  It&#8217;s only school-based personnel who will be able to see the pattern.  I hope chapters are alert for this.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYC Educator</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/comment-page-1#comment-4099</link>
		<dc:creator>NYC Educator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=244#comment-4099</guid>
		<description>&quot;there is no more SBO transfer...&quot;

Gee whiz.  Why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there is no more SBO transfer&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Gee whiz.  Why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd2718</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/comment-page-1#comment-4098</link>
		<dc:creator>jd2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=244#comment-4098</guid>
		<description>Persam,

there is no more SBO transfer.  I don&#039;t have any guidance yet on the new transfer plan. Stay tuned.  And be alert.  There may be funny wrinkles.

That being said, your advice will (likely) still be good:  there will be a list of schools, teachers should do due diligence before applying.

&amp; bxms teacher:  the first year is often awful.  I swear mine was the worst (but I know that that is not true).  You probably do not want to consider transferring multiple times in your first few years: principals will have the final say over most transfers, and if they see a resume with several schools... well, it won&#039;t go well.  So the questions I often prompt first year teachers to ask are:  How bad is this year?  Could you survive one or two more in your current school?  Would the extra experience gained by staying put a little longer help land you a better job when you do finally move?

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Persam,</p>
<p>there is no more SBO transfer.  I don&#8217;t have any guidance yet on the new transfer plan. Stay tuned.  And be alert.  There may be funny wrinkles.</p>
<p>That being said, your advice will (likely) still be good:  there will be a list of schools, teachers should do due diligence before applying.</p>
<p>&amp; bxms teacher:  the first year is often awful.  I swear mine was the worst (but I know that that is not true).  You probably do not want to consider transferring multiple times in your first few years: principals will have the final say over most transfers, and if they see a resume with several schools&#8230; well, it won&#8217;t go well.  So the questions I often prompt first year teachers to ask are:  How bad is this year?  Could you survive one or two more in your current school?  Would the extra experience gained by staying put a little longer help land you a better job when you do finally move?</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Persam1197</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/mid-year-evaluationwhere-do-i-go-from-here/comment-page-1#comment-4096</link>
		<dc:creator>Persam1197</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=244#comment-4096</guid>
		<description>Hang in there! There&#039;s a lot wrong with the system and it will probably continue like this because in most cases your adminstrative staff have no idea what they&#039;re doing. The DOE manufacturing supervisors who are unseasoned educators is coming at a price: burning out new teachers. 

Now for the positives: if you have kids learning and you are making a difference, that&#039;s what matters. You clearly have great interpersonal relationship skills and your kids need you. When you close the door to your room and it&#039;s just you and your kids and if there&#039;s magic, it&#039;s worth it! 

The first year is always tough. If you can hang in there, do so for the sake of your kids. However, if you feel that you are going to burn out, the SBO transfer list should be coming out very soon. Should you decide to transfer, don&#039;t make the same mistakes many of us have made in the past. Appearances can be deceiving. Talk to the staff at the school, especially the chapter leader to get the real deal at the new school. Check out the school report cards on line to see how well the school retains its staff. Also look for a balance between new and experienced personnel. A school with all newbies is not a good sign; they&#039;re easily abused because they don&#039;t know the system yet. If it&#039;s an old age home, that&#039;s not good either. Check out the educational philosophy of the school to see if its compatible with yours. 

Finally, network with other teachers throughout the system via the UFT Teacher Center (an invaluable resource), professional development days, etc. Networking can mean the difference, whether it&#039;s an opportunity to vent or to make a transfer to better environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang in there! There&#8217;s a lot wrong with the system and it will probably continue like this because in most cases your adminstrative staff have no idea what they&#8217;re doing. The DOE manufacturing supervisors who are unseasoned educators is coming at a price: burning out new teachers. </p>
<p>Now for the positives: if you have kids learning and you are making a difference, that&#8217;s what matters. You clearly have great interpersonal relationship skills and your kids need you. When you close the door to your room and it&#8217;s just you and your kids and if there&#8217;s magic, it&#8217;s worth it! </p>
<p>The first year is always tough. If you can hang in there, do so for the sake of your kids. However, if you feel that you are going to burn out, the SBO transfer list should be coming out very soon. Should you decide to transfer, don&#8217;t make the same mistakes many of us have made in the past. Appearances can be deceiving. Talk to the staff at the school, especially the chapter leader to get the real deal at the new school. Check out the school report cards on line to see how well the school retains its staff. Also look for a balance between new and experienced personnel. A school with all newbies is not a good sign; they&#8217;re easily abused because they don&#8217;t know the system yet. If it&#8217;s an old age home, that&#8217;s not good either. Check out the educational philosophy of the school to see if its compatible with yours. </p>
<p>Finally, network with other teachers throughout the system via the UFT Teacher Center (an invaluable resource), professional development days, etc. Networking can mean the difference, whether it&#8217;s an opportunity to vent or to make a transfer to better environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

