<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Post&#8217; Slam Means Edwize Doing Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eumenides</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/comment-page-1#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>eumenides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=39#comment-274</guid>
		<description>TGO

The use of &quot;good&quot; in the headline is a colloquialism, as in &quot;lookin&#039; good.&quot; As such it is proper usage. Changing that to &quot;looking well&quot; distorts the meaning. Also, saying Edwize is &quot;doing good,&quot; esp. after a slam from the Post, means it&#039;s doing god&#039;s work. As you know from reading the business pages, doing &quot;good&quot; and doing &quot;well&quot; are two different things. Both are grammatical.  
-E-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TGO</p>
<p>The use of &#8220;good&#8221; in the headline is a colloquialism, as in &#8220;lookin&#8217; good.&#8221; As such it is proper usage. Changing that to &#8220;looking well&#8221; distorts the meaning. Also, saying Edwize is &#8220;doing good,&#8221; esp. after a slam from the Post, means it&#8217;s doing god&#8217;s work. As you know from reading the business pages, doing &#8220;good&#8221; and doing &#8220;well&#8221; are two different things. Both are grammatical.<br />
-E-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/comment-page-1#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=39#comment-271</guid>
		<description>The New York Post is to journalism as a streetwalker is to romance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Post is to journalism as a streetwalker is to romance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGO</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/comment-page-1#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>TGO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=39#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Not one teacher/union official has to yet to point out the grammatical mistake in this post&#039;s headline!

If you can not catch a mistake after one week, how can you teach grammar to the children?

This is an FYI for all the teachers who fail to see the grammar error. It should say, &quot;&#039;Post&#039; Slam Means Edwize Doing Well.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not one teacher/union official has to yet to point out the grammatical mistake in this post&#8217;s headline!</p>
<p>If you can not catch a mistake after one week, how can you teach grammar to the children?</p>
<p>This is an FYI for all the teachers who fail to see the grammar error. It should say, &#8220;&#8216;Post&#8217; Slam Means Edwize Doing Well.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eumenides</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/comment-page-1#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>eumenides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=39#comment-159</guid>
		<description>You may be right that the writers on this new blog err on the side of the frisky,  though given other blogs I&#039;ve visited this bunch seem restrained. And the Post editorial did distort the blog posting; no one called Wal-Mart&#039;s managers war criminals. But if even putting the words &quot;Wal-Mart&quot; and &quot;war criminal&quot; in the same sentence is too close for comfort, how would you characterize the employment practices of Wal-Mart? To me, they look like the nasty machinations of the bad guy that Lionel Barrymore played in the old Jimmy Stewart Christmas movie, at least. Didn&#039;t you cheer when the greedy banker lost? Shouldn&#039;t we be booing Wal-Mart now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right that the writers on this new blog err on the side of the frisky,  though given other blogs I&#8217;ve visited this bunch seem restrained. And the Post editorial did distort the blog posting; no one called Wal-Mart&#8217;s managers war criminals. But if even putting the words &#8220;Wal-Mart&#8221; and &#8220;war criminal&#8221; in the same sentence is too close for comfort, how would you characterize the employment practices of Wal-Mart? To me, they look like the nasty machinations of the bad guy that Lionel Barrymore played in the old Jimmy Stewart Christmas movie, at least. Didn&#8217;t you cheer when the greedy banker lost? Shouldn&#8217;t we be booing Wal-Mart now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curious2</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/comment-page-1#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>curious2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=39#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Post&#039;s objection to the disclaimer on this site seems silly.

With respect to the war criminals reference, I do think the author of the posting in question was guilty of an excessively sensational comparison.  It seems to me sometimes that the writers on this blog write with a tone of extreme anger that weakens their message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Post&#8217;s objection to the disclaimer on this site seems silly.</p>
<p>With respect to the war criminals reference, I do think the author of the posting in question was guilty of an excessively sensational comparison.  It seems to me sometimes that the writers on this blog write with a tone of extreme anger that weakens their message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redhog</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/comment-page-1#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>redhog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=39#comment-156</guid>
		<description>The New York Post is not a good-faith adversary. It is a knee-jerk antagonist of unions, particularly of teachers.  Except to get rhetorical practice, there&#039;s nothing to be gained by debating the Post on the merits of issues. They will never print any op-ed piece that references unions in even a neutral way. Nor will they do that even in a &quot;straight&quot; news story.
Most alarming is how they will outright lie, or else wilfully tell only a portion of the total truth so that the effect is the same as a lie anyway.Terrifying is the implications for all persons in a free society, of a press controlled by the government,or the de facto government of corporate cronies and masters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Post is not a good-faith adversary. It is a knee-jerk antagonist of unions, particularly of teachers.  Except to get rhetorical practice, there&#8217;s nothing to be gained by debating the Post on the merits of issues. They will never print any op-ed piece that references unions in even a neutral way. Nor will they do that even in a &#8220;straight&#8221; news story.<br />
Most alarming is how they will outright lie, or else wilfully tell only a portion of the total truth so that the effect is the same as a lie anyway.Terrifying is the implications for all persons in a free society, of a press controlled by the government,or the de facto government of corporate cronies and masters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InstitutionalMemory</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/post-slam-means-edwize-doing-good/comment-page-1#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>InstitutionalMemory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/?p=39#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Being trashed by the Post is like making Nixon&#039;s &quot;enemies list.&quot;  Congratulations are in order!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being trashed by the Post is like making Nixon&#8217;s &#8220;enemies list.&#8221;  Congratulations are in order!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

