<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tenure Travails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edwize.org/tenure-travails/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edwize.org/tenure-travails</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jd2718</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/tenure-travails/comment-page-1#comment-18454</link>
		<dc:creator>jd2718</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/tenure-travails#comment-18454</guid>
		<description>At this point, do 1 in 2 actually reach the end of their fifth year, or is it less than 1 in 2?

And I need to agree with xkaydet65. Maybe I am off, but is there more harassment of new teachers going on now than in the past? The principal&#039;s obligation in regards to new teachers should be training, but I am hearing of U-observations in the first month of someone&#039;s career. How can that make sense?

It is my impression that a disproportionate number of the supervisors who are harassing newer teachers are new principals, especially (but not exclusively) from the various quick roads to Principal-dom, including the Leadership Academy. I advise teachers seeking their first placements to look at larger schools. This is one of the reasons.

Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, do 1 in 2 actually reach the end of their fifth year, or is it less than 1 in 2?</p>
<p>And I need to agree with xkaydet65. Maybe I am off, but is there more harassment of new teachers going on now than in the past? The principal&#8217;s obligation in regards to new teachers should be training, but I am hearing of U-observations in the first month of someone&#8217;s career. How can that make sense?</p>
<p>It is my impression that a disproportionate number of the supervisors who are harassing newer teachers are new principals, especially (but not exclusively) from the various quick roads to Principal-dom, including the Leadership Academy. I advise teachers seeking their first placements to look at larger schools. This is one of the reasons.</p>
<p>Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xkaydet65</title>
		<link>http://www.edwize.org/tenure-travails/comment-page-1#comment-17554</link>
		<dc:creator>xkaydet65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwize.org/tenure-travails#comment-17554</guid>
		<description>Of course with the number of qualified and caring supervisors in short supply it&#039;s no wonder that Klein must seek other means of evaluating teachers for tenure. For example I just received an E Mail from my subject supervisor, dated Jan 30 at 9 PM that I am required to give a mid term exam some time in the middle of January. Do you really want to be rated by such a supervisor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course with the number of qualified and caring supervisors in short supply it&#8217;s no wonder that Klein must seek other means of evaluating teachers for tenure. For example I just received an E Mail from my subject supervisor, dated Jan 30 at 9 PM that I am required to give a mid term exam some time in the middle of January. Do you really want to be rated by such a supervisor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
